书籍 Good to Great的封面

Good to Great

Jim Collins

出版时间

2001-10-16

ISBN

9780066620992

评分

★★★★★

标签

经济

书籍介绍

Five years ago, Jim Collins asked the question, "Can a good company become a great company and if so, how?" In Good to Great Collins, the author of Built to Last, concludes that it is possible, but finds there are no silver bullets. Collins and his team of researchers began their quest by sorting through a list of 1,435 companies, looking for those that made substantial improvements in their performance over time. They finally settled on 11--including Fannie Mae, Gillette, Walgreens, and Wells Fargo--and discovered common traits that challenged many of the conventional notions of corporate success. Making the transition from good to great doesn't require a high-profile CEO, the latest technology, innovative change management, or even a fine-tuned business strategy. At the heart of those rare and truly great companies was a corporate culture that rigorously found and promoted disciplined people to think and act in a disciplined manner. Peppered with dozens of stories and examples from the great and not so great, the book offers a well-reasoned road map to excellence that any organization would do well to consider. Like Built to Last, Good to Great is one of those books that managers and CEOs will be reading and rereading for years to come. --Harry C. Edwards, Amazon.com Review

目录
Acknowledgements
Preface
1. Good is the enemy of great
2. Level 6 leadership
3. First who... then what

显示全部
用户评论
B-school的成功学... - -
看二遍还是觉得啰嗦一页纸就够了
Quality of the book is not matched by the fame of Jim Collins
即使到今天看,Good to Great都是Rework的超集,而且还是12年前写的。
耐着性子看到p13...真的是不忍卒读!不忍卒读啊!!!!!
模型特别朴素:从500强中挑转型成功并维持住成果的公司做观察对象,挑跟对象同行业同状况但转型失败的公司作comparison companies,再挑同期转型成功但没能维持成功的单位,三类并比,观察其CEO的特点,用人风格,转型strategy,vision。模型虽然朴素,可单观察其CEOs都要读几十年的各种商业评论、采访,project执行起来繁琐而冗长,很佩服他们项目组的耐心跟洞察力。hedgehog concept我们老板也喜欢讲,但真正能执行首尾,不简单。前段时间刚好读了GE的Hot Seat,跟Jeff Immelt自己的观察比,他们的研究浮于表面的感觉,可这种对比实则洞察。我当初参加公司的大客户经理培训,就觉得很多内容其实是有门槛的,entrepreneur 读会很有收获。
干货极少,不好的是作者根据几十年股票数据选出十几个公司称作"最好",有种黑箱之外的过拟合的感觉。一点稍微值得称赞的干货: 有些公司的economic engine (改变KPI)是不错的
找对了方法,有了飞轮效应,成为优秀比保持平庸并不怎么费力,而且更能找到人生的意义感,为啥不去追求优秀一点了? the culture of displine,the flywheel effect,get right person on bus ,the level 5 leadership ,Stocktale paradox.
越来越觉得聚焦幸存者偏差的显学很难打动我。
我读的第一本英文书,被人拿走没还!懊恼!