书籍 The Tyranny of Merit的封面

The Tyranny of Merit

Michael J. Sandel

出版社

Penguin

出版时间

2021-09-13

ISBN

9780141991177

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

These are dangerous times for democracy. We live in an age of winners and losers, where the odds are stacked in favour of the already fortunate. Stalled social mobility and entrenched inequality give the lie to the promise that "you can make it if you try". And the consequence is a brew of anger and frustration that has fuelled populist protest, with the triumph of Brexit and election of Donald Trump.

Michael J. Sandel argues that to overcome the polarized politics of our time, we must rethink the attitudes toward success and failure that have accompanied globalisation and rising inequality. Sandel highlights the hubris a meritocracy generates among the winners and the harsh judgement it imposes on those left behind. He offers an alternative way of thinking about success - more attentive to the role of luck in human affairs, more conducive to an ethic of humility, and more hospitable to a politics of the common good.

Michael J. Sandel teaches political philosophy at Harvard University. His books What Money Can't Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets, and Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do? were international best sellers and have been translated into 27 languages. Sandel's legendary course 'Justice' was the first Harvard course to be made freely available online and on television and has been...

(展开全部)

用户评论
1.每次阅读老美自己写自己的文章,都不得不佩服它对内对外的宣传能力。阶层流动画饼,学历内卷(甚至为此作弊),通过考试来给人分类分层这些在美国通通都有,而在某些人眼中,这或是东亚通病或是中国特色。明明是世界范围内的阶级问题,偏要说成是国家或者文化问题,这经常导致一种让人哭笑不得的现象:总给自己反对的东西站台而不自知。部分群体甚至还有自己革自己的命的倾向。2.老美也知道专家不一定对或者也会因为某些原因说一些bullshit,但是大家普遍对专家这个群体还是趋之若鹜。关于不讲科学立场先行这事,其中有段内容更是令人印象深刻:我们可以讨论这张椅子是否是好椅子,是否应该换了这张椅子,是否应该移动这椅子,但你不能说它是一头大象。当初通过“90%无症状,小感冒,否认长新冠”推放开的何尝又不是自己讨厌的专家呢?
按观念的撼动程度来讲可以五星,但从阅读体验上可能给四星,综合四星半吧。在Sandel的Justice公开课上就被他对Rawls关于中高产收入的随机性和对其税收的合理性观点所震撼,在那之前也许我的大部分自尊自信和骄傲都源自盛行的精英主义观念,少数的对“公正、平等”口号的附和之中,对弱势群体的关爱之中,不乏有骄傲于自己道德水平的目的。Justice给了被精英主义灌输多年的我一个反思的开端,这本书则是把这种自傲放在社会大环境中仔细分析其来龙去脉,全球范围内大行精英主义的初心不一定是毒药,但它应该只是通往更理想社会的一个应急措施。只是尝到了甜头的“精英们”被他们享受着的眷顾包裹着,再难由奢入俭,底层与顶层对彼此来说都太过虚无缥缈,责怪彼此比大幅撼动现有的社会价值体系要容易太多,但社会终究不该是机器。