书籍 Liberty的封面

Liberty

Isaiah Berlin

出版时间

2002-03-07

ISBN

9780199249893

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

Liberty is a revised and expanded edition of the book that Isaiah Berlin regarded as his most important—Four Essays on Liberty, a standard text of liberalism, constantly in demand and constantly discussed since it was first published in 1969. Writing in Harper's, Irving Howe described it as "an exhilarating performance—this, one tells oneself, is what the life of the mind can be."

Berlin's editor Henry Hardy has revised the text, incorporating a fifth essay that Berlin himself had wanted to include. He has also added further pieces that bear on the same topic, so that Berlin's principal statements on liberty are at last available together in one volume. Finally, in an extended preface and in appendices drawn from Berlin's unpublished writings, he exhibits some of the biographical sources of Berlin's lifelong preoccupation with liberalism. These additions help us to grasp the nature of Berlin's "inner citadel," as he called it—the core of personal conviction from which some of his most influential writing sprung.

Sir Isaiah Berlin was a philosopher and historian of ideas, regarded as one of the leading liberal thinkers of the twentieth century. He excelled as an essayist, lecturer and conversationalist; and as a brilliant speaker who delivered, rapidly and spontaneously, richly allusive and coherently structured material, whether for a lecture series at Oxford University or as a broadca...

(展开全部)

目录
The Editor's Tale
Five Essays on Liberty
Introduction
Political Ideas in the Twentieth Century
Historical Inevitability

显示全部
用户评论
初读会受益于伯林的强梳理能力,让对自由的讨论有起点可寻。但因为始终没有给出清晰哪怕很薄的界定,使得内部诸多不一致。如果采取“同情式”的理解,可能要回到他当时要揭示的价值多元论命题,当然这又是一个棘手的问题。
以多元主义为基础的论述读起来真的点头如捣蒜w
四年前读过Two Concepts of Liberty,伯林也在不知不觉中影响着我的很多思考方式。那时觉得他尤为抽丝剥茧绵密通透——现在我保留这个判断,只是难免对方阵营就层层归谬到死讽刺挖苦到透,自己立场就是好一朵美丽的白莲花,又香又白人人夸。。。
因为哲学课读的书越来越看不懂/不感兴趣了所以我决定每本下面编些不相干的胡话,整理的时候就感觉好像自己真有收获一样。水手需要预测暴风雨的时候,会跑到甲板上用鼻子吸一吸,再不济就伸舌头尝一尝,吉兆是仍然咸涩的海风,凶兆是坏血病梦境般温柔甜蜜的鲜橙味。
PT 101
其实 Berlin 说,Two Concepts 那篇文章,主要是历史性的辨析,而非哲学性的辨析。
按柏林,古希腊的个人主义显于公元前4-3世纪拐角。但是令人困惑的问题是,从柏拉图到芝诺等人的转变过程中,到底发生了什么。虽然柏林讨论着古希腊个人主义,但他引用的却是罗斯托夫采夫等人,而非古朗士与格罗兹。后者从城邦内部社会生活的变化中,讨论了个人主义是如何在城邦兴起的。至于结尾以贵族抱怨城邦生活为例,实际上有些不适合。雅典内部纷争是从梭伦时期就一直蛰伏着,而公元前5世纪下叶以降的战争,损耗的正是富裕阶层。日益趋平化的社会图景,对于往昔富裕者而言,如若无法通过政治获取权力与声望,那么以巧妙的方式回归自我,似乎是很直接的选择。
与译林内容一致。除了删改字词
中英一起看的。读完了,大受启发大受震撼,把自由的概念啊,形成啊,政体啊分析地好清楚啊!虽然有一些部分还可能不是很懂。读完挺佩服John Mill的🙏摘一句不错的话:“to realize the relative validity of one‘s conviction’s and stand for them unflinchingly is what distinguishes a civilized man from a barbarian.”