书籍 Causation的封面

Causation

Mumford, Stephen

出版社

OUP Oxford

出版时间

2013-11-28

ISBN

9780199684434

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

Causation is the most fundamental connection in the universe. Without it, there would be no science or technology. There would be no moral responsibility either, as none of our thoughts would be connected with our actions and none of our actions with any consequences. Nor would we have a system of law because blame resides only in someone having caused injury or damage.

Any intervention we make in the world around us is premised on there being causal connections that are, to a degree, predictable. It is causation that is at the basis of prediction and also explanation. This Very Short Introduction introduces the key theories of causation and also the surrounding debates and controversies. Do causes produce their effects by guaranteeing them? Do causes have to precede their effects? Can causation be reduced to the forces of physics? And are we right to think of causation as one single thing at all?

Stephen Mumford is Professor of Metaphysics at the Department of Philosophy, University of Nottingham, and Dean of the Faculty of Arts. He has written several books on this topic, including Dispositions (OUP, 1998), Laws in Nature (Routledge, 2004), Getting Causes from Powers (with Rani Lill Anjum, OUP, 2011), and Metaphysics: A Very Short Introduction (OUP, 2012).

Rani Lill An...

(展开全部)

用户评论
怎么还会有人用manual的标准来要求introduction呢... 神奇
思辨性很强,主题也很有趣重要。浏览了各家学说和各自的局限、反例;叙述的顺序也是层层递进,各家你方唱罢我登场,非常利于读者登堂入室。哲学书就该这样有趣又有启发性。里面的一些涉及科学理论的东西有点幼稚外行,这恐怕是其唯一的缺点吧。
关于什么是“Causation”的各种观点。然而有没有一种可能,这些观点回答的不是用一个Causation,而是一类家族相似的Causation?
不严谨
缺少分析,实际上不同的人在用cause这个词的时候心里想表达的含义就不一样,如果不注重这个含义的区别,推理不出什么有用的结论
因果关系可能是第一重要的,因为涉及我们对世界的解释以及人类行动的由来和和责任。Causation is the most fundamental connection in the universe. Without it, there is no moral responsibility: none of our thoughts would be connected with our actions and none of our actions with any consequences.
作为通识读物已经很棒了。前五章大致是休谟对causation的还原处理及反对立场,就此铺开地图。章六说emergentism原则上强调lower-level physical things的低解释力,但这一导读似乎太笼统而过时了,例如忽略了group dynamics的强涌生性与世纪末一众批判实在论者对decomposition的重视(R. Collins,2004;P. S. Gorski,2003)。第七章狠批多元论,直接以推论主义为anti-realism about causation而急需事实之于推论的效力,继而指出多元论的涣散,只能失败。如果只写到这,那多少不太讨喜,但本书迅速把这一话题引申到了身心关系与主体间性,这就令视野豁然开朗(或者说瞬间复杂了几倍)。可惜没咋展开前沿研究。