书籍 Image Science的封面

Image Science

W. J. T. Mitchell

出版时间

2015-10-27

ISBN

9780226231334

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

Almost thirty years ago, W. J. T. Mitchell’s "Iconology" helped launch the interdisciplinary study of visual media, now a central feature of the humanities. Along with his subsequent "Picture Theory" and "What Do Pictures Want?", Mitchell’s now-classic work introduced such ideas as the pictorial turn, the image/picture distinction, the metapicture, and the biopicture. These key concepts imply an approach to images as true objects of investigation—an “image science.”

Continuing with this influential line of thought, Image Science gathers Mitchell’s most recent essays on media aesthetics, visual culture, and artistic symbolism. The chapters delve into such topics as the physics and biology of images, digital photography and realism, architecture and new media, and the occupation of space in contemporary popular uprisings. The book looks both backward at the emergence of iconology as a field and forward toward what might be possible if image science can indeed approach pictures the same way that empirical sciences approach natural phenomena.

Essential for those involved with any aspect of visual media, Image Science is a brilliant call for a method of studying images that overcomes the “two-culture split” between the natural and human sciences.

W. J. T. 米契爾W. J. T. Mitchell

任教於美國芝加哥大學藝術史與英語文學系,為該校之「蓋洛德•唐納利傑出貢獻講座」教授(the Gaylord Donnelley Distinguished Service Professor),並擔任《批判性探討》(Critical Inquiry)期刊編輯。

譯者簡介

石武耕

台北人。政大廣告系、台灣大學新聞所畢。現就讀於巴黎第十大學傳播學博士班。

譯作《藝術的法則:文學場域的生成與結構》(合譯)、《編劇的藝術》(合譯)、《深南地方》。

目录
List of Illustrations
Preface: Figures and Grounds
Acknowledgments
Part One: Figures
1 Art History on the Edge: Iconology, Media, and Visual Culture

显示全部
用户评论
更像研究随笔。也应引起重视
符合预期。mais pour moi la question est la (ou une) nécessité d'une approche disciplinaire - ou en d'autres termes, la temp-sensibilité d'une anxiété disciplinaire héritée des premiers temps de l'histoire de l'art - à la ca nouvelle époque des sciences humaines.
”Image Science”的论述虽然从“不再把科学实践中的图像当given而是当taken/produced”的论调入手,但这些图像并没有成为直接的分析对象,而是提供了更多(反复?)论证wjtm之前思考的metapicture(比如化石和克隆这对来自历史两头的图像形式)。直接后果就是:说着image/picture的化分是辩证的,但似乎对他来说图像本质还是symbolic的,因而(再次?)错过用“图像怎么看”这个(不一定非是technodeterminist)的问题去丰富图像的ontology和hermaneutics之间的论述。不过因为前几篇言简意赅,希望确实是读他的一个好的startpoint。
大师都要这么self-referential 的吗