书籍 The Great Derangement的封面

The Great Derangement

Amitav Ghosh

出版时间

2016-09-22

ISBN

9780226323039

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

Are we deranged? The acclaimed Indian novelist Amitav Ghosh argues that future generations may well think so. How else to explain our imaginative failure in the face of global warming? In his first major book of nonfiction since In an Antique Land, Ghosh examines our inability—at the level of literature, history, and politics—to grasp the scale and violence of climate change.

The extreme nature of today’s climate events, Ghosh asserts, make them peculiarly resistant to contemporary modes of thinking and imagining. This is particularly true of serious literary fiction: hundred-year storms and freakish tornadoes simply feel too improbable for the novel; they are automatically consigned to other genres. In the writing of history, too, the climate crisis has sometimes led to gross simplifications; Ghosh shows that the history of the carbon economy is a tangled global story with many contradictory and counterintuitive elements.

Ghosh ends by suggesting that politics, much like literature, has become a matter of personal moral reckoning rather than an arena of collective action. But to limit fiction and politics to individual moral adventure comes at a great cost. The climate crisis asks us to imagine other forms of human existence—a task to which fiction, Ghosh argues, is the best suited of all cultural forms. His book serves as a great writer’s summons to confront the most urgent task of our time.

Amitav Ghosh is an award-winning novelist and essayist whose books include The Circle of Reason, The Shadow Lines, In An Antique Land, Dancing in Cambodia, The Calcutta Chromosome, The Glass Palace, The Hungry Tide, and the Ibis Trilogy: Sea of Poppies, River of Smoke, and Flood of Fire.

用户评论
讲气候变化与文学与历史与政治的关系。一再强调气候问题的同时,又仿佛与气候问题没有关联。只是在为如何重新看或者写或者认识或者体验文学,历史,政治提供新的角度与材料。
读了第三部分 因为气候变化的instantiation(看起来)太荒诞/灾难/巧合所以无法写得(看起来)日常/真实 是啊 人类还生活在一种觉得灾难是例外的迷思和想象中 即便现在什么是eventful什么是mundane在人类世中早已分不清了...
其实就算两部分吧。前一章讲文学和气候灾难的联系,二者都是属于讲probability进行emplotment。吊诡的是,这种“不正常”再被慢慢地被“正常化”。即使小说/气候灾难有多么现实,人们开始不相信。第二三章则是对气候危机的一种探究。作者认为资本主义-帝国才是罪魁祸首。基于碳的经济发展/大提速/现代化/西方繁荣,说到底都是一种霸权话语。基于此的发展不平衡必然导致气候危机在根本上解决是一种悖论。只有关注气候问题才能改变文学形式,只有走向一种集体导向的艺术才能解决气候问题。作者的殖民立场几乎是将人类纪的问题政治化,做成了一个意识形态的批判。的确很多时候我们没意识到自己思考的方式已经被软殖民了。但是从根本上说,碳经济就是人类纪的基础,因为人本身就是碳。尘归尘土归土的本质还是碳的生成/竞争/消耗
字里行间的自大令人不适
从文学,经济,政治等角度分析当代世界对气候改变的认识。作者的想法很是浪漫,简直跟写小说一样。
Fiction的伟大和不可替代性就在于使各种可能性成为可能。气候危机所带来的挑战在于想象人类存在的其他形式,而小说正是回应这种挑战的最佳形式。但现代小说却转向了不同的方向——描写真实生活,充满想象力的科幻等虚构作品被主流文学边缘化。在个人道德冒险方面构想小说的悖论和代价在于它否定了可能性本身,因此如今的小说无法很好的反映出气候变化和极端天气变化等主题。
最有价值的是第一部分,从个人创作,经验和家乡出发,对自然环境跟人类世界二分在文学领域的演绎和批判,结论是小说是form of logocentrism,climate change根本上需要think beyond language,但在今天将SF视为边缘化文学的观点见仁见智;第二部分历史比较common sense,人类现代化简史科普读物。可以看出三部分小说,历史,ZZ的并列来intervene climate change的野心很大。但跨越界限的写作尝试混合了南亚高种姓男性知识分子的tone,让人出戏到国内的“文化散文随笔。”Sign, 受到西方认可的男性知识分子写作往往并不比白男更acceptable。
高希关注的核心问题之一即在于现代小说为何没有及时回应气候变化等极端不可能事件。某种程度上相当于詹姆逊在《现实主义二律背反》中讨论的叙事与情动的区别。
Audible 3.17. 2022. Climate change and the human predicament from a cultural and literary perspective.