书籍 Logics of History的封面

Logics of History

William H. Sewell Jr.

出版时间

2005-08-01

ISBN

9780226749181

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

While social scientists and historians have been exchanging ideas for a long time, they have never developed a proper dialogue about social theory. William H. Sewell Jr. observes that on questions of theory the communication has been mostly one way: from social science to history. Logics of History argues that both history and the social sciences have something crucial to offer each other. While historians do not think of themselves as theorists, they know something social scientists do not: how to think about the temporalities of social life. On the other hand, while social scientists’ treatments of temporality are usually clumsy, their theoretical sophistication and penchant for structural accounts of social life could offer much to historians.

Renowned for his work at the crossroads of history, sociology, political science, and anthropology, Sewell argues that only by combining a more sophisticated understanding of historical time with a concern for larger theoretical questions can a satisfying social theory emerge. In Logics of History, he reveals the shape such an engagement could take, some of the topics it could illuminate, and how it might affect both sides of the disciplinary divide.

William H. Sewell Jr. is the Frank P. Hixon Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science and History at the University of Chicago. He is the author of three previous books, including Work and Revolution in France and A Rhetoric of Bourgeois Revolution.

用户评论
“...a reality previously represented by such religious concepts as Divine Will or Providence”成了“过去由诸如神意和天道这类宗教概念主宰的人类身处的现实”@@不得不说,两个译者讨巧得很……可能要很久才读得“完”……不“读过”就会永远在读了……
这段时间的读书计划没有顺利完成。。。。:(我很自责。。
:无
强推,前两章的社会史/新文化史综述,对cultural turn的反思以及自己的dual structure的概念建构都值得认真反思,最后提出的return of social也是我希望踏足的领域
不同学科的人对这本书的评价很不一样,跟与这本书有关的学术史有关,也跟各学科方法和材料-立论-分析之间的度有关。如何理解和评价是个有些意思的话题。|休爷您就不能不那么罗嗦么?完全可以化约节省至少四分之一的篇幅也讲得清诶
非常同意culture的定义和特征,以及确实从“亲缘性”上说历史学和人类学相比起历史学和其他社会科学要更近一点。
Chapters 1-2 尤其是第二章对cultural turn历史知识生产和资本主义关系的反思很精彩 (出这本书的时候似乎还没有neoliberalism 这个词🤔
第五章,在后现代遗产下丧失了抵抗力的人类学
读了一个学期,算是文化和历史社会学这两个subfield的必读书了。Sewell给历史社会学乃至社会理论带来的转变可谓是历史社会学的康德了。
出乎意料地好读,并在艳羡中同样生出了对本人所在的搅屎棍学科全无立足理论的担忧(。