书籍 A Vindication of the Rights of Woman的封面

A Vindication of the Rights of Woman

Wollstonecraft, Mary

出版社

Dover Pubns

出版时间

1970-01-01

ISBN

9780486290362

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

A Vindication of the Rights of Woman is one of the trailblazing works of feminism. Published in 1792, Wollstonecraft’s work argued that the educational system of her time deliberately trained women to be frivolous and incapable. She posited that an educational system that allowed girls the same advantages as boys would result in women who would be not only exceptional wives and mothers but also capable workers in many professions. Other early feminists had made similar pleas for improved education for women, but Wollstonecraft’s work was unique in suggesting that the betterment of women’s status be effected through such political change as the radical reform of national educational systems. Such change, she concluded, would benefit all society.

-- Encyclopedia Britannica

Mary Wollstonecraft (1759-1797), English writer and passionate advocate of educational and social equality for women.

The daughter of a farmer, Wollstonecraft taught school and worked as a governess, experiences that inspired her views in Thoughts on the Education of Daughters (1787). In 1788 she began working as a translator for the London publisher James Johnson, who publishe...

(展开全部)

用户评论
MW有理性吗?我不知道 可能有。但MW有逻辑吗?绝对没有。结构松散就不说了 一直在螺旋论证循环往复 为女👊辩护至少得思路清明吧?看着都气了 气死我6
Mary Wollonstone在妇女解放过程中打破了传统优雅的淑女概念,这是弥漫在所有宗教哲学艺术文化领域的厌女香薰,即使美如奥菲利亚也要因听到『get thee to a nunnery』陷入绝望的疯癫从而寻死成为一个唯美的永恒征记。同样不可或缺的是对基督教神学patriarchal structure的反抗,『Thus Milton...women are formed for softness and sweet attractive grace』,与此同时,她声称男性『good conduct..attempting to keep them in a state of childhood』,这种加诸于弱势群体的『甜美』、『柔软』、『年幼』的外來幻想始终是女性意识觉醒之路上的宿敌。
为什么在浪漫主义已经蓄势待发的年代沃斯通克拉夫特仍要捡起启蒙时期的遗物——“理智教育”,因为女性认知落后了男性认知不知多少个世纪!!妇女的权力何在?平等地站在男性身旁,用柔和也坚定的语调《致橡树》。
除了redundancy其它满分
我都算不出来多少节课读了它。。。四五节课?文学课上老师说现在没人读wollstoncraft你们可能没听过她的名字更估计不会去读她的作品,我吓了一跳
Introduction, Chapter 1–4, Chap 5 sec 1&4, Chap 9
今年读的书1: 怎么说呢 如果我按照我现在对女权的理解我可能不能完全的同意她的观点 但是观点不能独立于时代 不管是她表达的角度和语言都需要结合他所在的历史衡量 综合来看我认为还是一本非常震撼的作品
观点有阶级的局限性;但是能在那个年代将女权问题散射到类似的群体,性别问题需要开化的男女联手解决,是难能可贵的。