书籍 Manhua Modernity的封面

Manhua Modernity

John A. Crespi

出版时间

2020-12-01

ISBN

9780520309104

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

From fashion sketches of smartly dressed Shanghai dandies in the 1920s, to multipanel drawings of refugee urbanites during the war against Japan, to panoramic pictures of anti-American propaganda rallies in the early 1950s, the polymorphic cartoon-style art known as manhua helped define China’s modern experience. Manhua Modernity offers a richly illustrated, deeply contextualized analysis of these illustrations across the lively pages of popular pictorial magazines that entertained, informed, and mobilized a nation through a half century of political and cultural transformation. In this compelling media history, John Crespi argues that manhua must be understood in the context of the pictorial magazines that hosted them, and in turn these magazines must be seen as important mediators of the modern urban experience. Even as times changed—from interwar-era consumerism to war-time mobilization to Mao-style propaganda—the art form adapted to stay on the cutting edge of both politics and style.

John Crespi is an Associate Professor of Chinese and Asian Studies in the Department of East Asian Languages and Literatures at Colgate University. He is the author of Voices in Revolution: Poetry and the Auditory Imagination in Modern China

用户评论
本书主要探讨了1930年代左右以《上海漫画》为代表的漫画杂志、抗战时期武汉漫画的宣传画、张光宇的《西游漫记》和毛时代的《漫画月刊》。《上海漫画》与我目前所看的材料直接相关,漫画不仅像其他期刊一样,宣传名流、世界性知识与现代城市知识,也以一种独立于政治外的态度嘲讽体制。此外,书中第四章关于《漫画月刊》的分析也给我很大启发:在《漫画月刊》的漫画中呈现两种叙事模式:一种是国家意识形态下,进步的、线性的宣传模式;另一种是在日常生活中,国家宣传话语的异质性图像:这些图像一定程度上挑战了原有的正面形象。需要指出的是,这些日常性漫画一直在官方控制之下运作,是国家宣传话语的补充。(看别人的研究容易,自己动手好难
Crespi对漫画史的熟悉度和对材料的敏感度都令人印象深刻,即便是当下的相关外延现象也有着明确的问题意识(尽管没有办法展开)。后两章之前分别在别的书里读过,但尤其是漫画月刊一章的关注点要比maoist laughter里呈现的有趣,案例信息量也更丰富。
主要论点是漫画在中国的出现是通过/基于/作为画报这个媒介。作者批评已有的漫画史书写总是把漫画和历史危机、救亡绑在一起,假设图像之于观者有某种绝对的效力,但就像画报一样,漫画作为民国上海视觉生态的一个元素,更主要的是促成了一个存在于subaltern日常生活中的“(视觉)诠释共同体”,而不是安德森式的想象的共同体。如果说彭丽君的pictorial turn中,西方和现代都成为观看和试图把握的对象,Crespi的pictorial turn侧重于反观作为观者的自己和以画报为主导的都市视觉环境。读完只能觉得说漫画研究可能还在初期,对起话来像在打稻草人,视觉策略上对《点石斋》的延续、对其他文化中漫画形式的挪用重组都没有细谈。张光宇的西游记被当成元图像分析,问题是按米切尔的说法所有图像都可以是元图像?