书籍 Justice as Fairness的封面

Justice as Fairness

John Rawls

出版社

Belknap Press

出版时间

2001-05-15

ISBN

9780674005112

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

This volume originated as lectures for a course on political philosophy that Rawls taught regularly at Harvard in the 1980s. In time the lectures became a restatement of his theory of justice as fairness, revised in light of his more recent papers and his treatise Political Liberalism (1993). John Rawls offers a broad overview of his main lines of thought and also explores specific issues never before addressed in any of his writings. Rawls is well aware that since the publication of "A Theory of Justice" in 1971, American society has moved farther away from the idea of justice as fairness. Yet his ideas retain their power and relevance to debates in a pluralistic society about the meaning and theoretical viability of liberalism. This book demonstrates that moral clarity can be achieved even when a collective commitment to justice is uncertain.

约翰·罗尔斯(John Rawls,1921—2002),美国当代著名哲学家、伦理学家、政治学家、 哈佛大学教授。1921 年生于马里兰州,就学于普林斯顿大学,1950 年在该校获哲学博士学位,以后相继在普林斯顿大学(1950-1952),康奈尔大学(1953-1962),哈佛大学(1962-2002) 任教。罗尔斯自50年代起便潜心于社会正义问题的研究,《正义论》(1971) 是他集其论文之精粹并经过重新思考而形成的一部完整而一贯的理论著作。罗尔斯还出版了其它专著:《政治自由主义》 (1993), 《万民法》 (1999), 《道德哲学史讲演》 (2000)。 《正义论》已被誉为二战后政治哲学、伦理学领域中最重要的理论著作,将被列入历史经典名著之林。

用户评论
补标。评分代表客观重要性而不代表个人认可度。。。
tutorial上我說我不喜歡羅爾斯的一點是我覺得他"正義"的社會裡沒有人的踪影, 因為那個社會 doesn't reward luck, talent, or family backgrounds (正是這些東西才把人區別開來), tutor 說不不在羅爾斯的社會裡we are all free and equal citizens, 只是你不一定能找到Daisy (as someone who has luck, talent and well-off family)而已
我完全可以理解为什么现在西方学界很难跳出Rawls的horizon,因为他的理论的确算是既normatively sound又substantial;但我总觉得,嘛,不够让人感觉有方向性嘛,特别是我作为一个并不相信government in the first place的人。
斗胆说一下,干酪那篇评论对原初状态中的立约者的理解有些小问题。立约者其实没有被设定成“无禀赋无偏好”,而是对自身之拥有两种道德能力及liberties的优先性等事项有领悟的,就这个意义而言,无知之幕所排除的其实只是“某部分特定的禀赋和偏好”,可惜这在《正义论》一书当中表述得不是很直白。此外,就原初状态本身的性质而言,它是一种“代表装置”(device of representation),是一种启发性的、引导公民进行判断的指导性框架——说白了就是一个协助公民就政治正义原则达成反思平衡的理论工具,其调和性甚于奠基性。当然,这个理论工具本身有何种方法学意涵,其运作结果能否作为政治辩护的依据等等,仍面临很多批评和质疑,但那是另外的问题了。
不怎么参照着姚大志亲笔签名的《作为公平的正义》一书,读完了英文版,对罗尔斯的正义理论有所了解
risk-aversion
评分只针对写作风格,墨迹的句子特别多,行文格式长,晦涩,不简洁,
高中时读到这本书的感动与波澜,如今尽是失意。那些关于overlapping consensus/public reason的信念既真实又虚幻…可能还是要带着这些走很久很久
这理说的,🐮👃。I should definitely look into a comparison of western and Chinese concepts of equality. “A conception of justice cannot be deduced from self-evident premises or conditions on principles; instead, its justification is a matter of the mutual support of many considerations, of everything fitting together into one coherent view.”
后半本没读完。读的时候感觉这写法真是太technical太枯燥了,但之后发现自己还是会时不时想起来里面的各种概念,才意识到自己受到它影响的程度可能比想象的大得多,还是有点厉害。