书籍 Justice for Hedgehogs的封面

Justice for Hedgehogs

Ronald Dworkin

出版社

Belknap Press

出版时间

2011-01-10

ISBN

9780674046719

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

The fox knows many things, the Greeks said, but the hedgehog knows one big thing. In his most comprehensive work Ronald Dworkin argues that value in all its forms is one big thing: that what truth is, life means, morality requires, and justice demands are different aspects of the same large question. He develops original theories on a great variety of issues very rarely considered in the same book: moral skepticism, literary, artistic, and historical interpretation, free will, ancient moral theory, being good and living well, liberty, equality, and law among many other topics. What we think about any one of these must stand up, eventually, to any argument we find compelling about the rest.

Skepticism in all its forms—philosophical, cynical, or post-modern—threatens that unity. The Galilean revolution once made the theological world of value safe for science. But the new republic gradually became a new empire: the modern philosophers inflated the methods of physics into a totalitarian theory of everything. They invaded and occupied all the honorifics—reality, truth, fact, ground, meaning, knowledge, and being—and dictated the terms on which other bodies of thought might aspire to them, and skepticism has been the inevitable result. We need a new revolution. We must make the world of science safe for value.

用户评论
德老认为我们无法逃避道德,最根本地是因为选择做何事总是需要理由。然而正如 Richard Joyce 在此十年前便指出的,这恰恰说明无法逃脱的是实践理性,而不是普遍的道德。可惜,德老只提及了后者一次,未触及此一关键点。虽然他老也承认道德怀疑论目前在元伦理学界已做稳了主流。
重读了内在怀疑论和interpretation部分的内容。
那天看《法理学》里头Morrison专门提到德沃金的修辞力,想想真是如此。很多比喻乍看不可思议,再看就发现真是不可思议。
形而上学、认识论、真之理论……各个方面的基础都还不够。先停一停。
豆瓣M的第1000本,德翁最佳,超五星杰作。道德truth的存在和解释型特征,然后以尊严为基础从ethics到morality到political morality到law整全结构。德翁真刺(guo)猬(jing)!
因此,法律也是一种grounds,我们在此基础之上提出一种可以被courts执行的权利主张,这样的实践本身处在更大的political value network之中。
我同意
想知道什么是重要之事。把阅读和自己真正关切的事情结合起来。/7.15看过一遍,还没有细读。/8.20这一遍读下来对德翁的目标和论证细节有了更清楚的认识,但是第4、5、8章还是有很多不理解的地方。读完第八章最后几节之后应该开始动手写,厘清自己为什么不理解这些论证。确定命题和论证,学习实践技艺。/1号钻探平台。11.1/第一次模仿德翁的进路写作以失败告终。在DDL之前交了半成稿。看看德翁写的,再看看我自己写的。只有一句评价,“咳,什么垃圾玩意!”。11.9写下了第一句,至少我开始写了。愿德翁佑我!12.15/暂时放一下吧,感谢德瓮。
真的没人觉得写的有点啰嗦么……