书籍 Range的封面

Range

David Epstein

出版时间

2019-05-27

ISBN

9780735214484

评分

★★★★★

标签

教育

书籍介绍

“Range is an urgent and important book, an essential read for bosses, parents, coaches, and anyone who cares about improving performance.” —Daniel H. Pink

What's the most effective path to success in any domain? It's not what you think.

Plenty of experts argue that anyone who wants to develop a skill, play an instrument, or lead their field should start early, focus intensely, and rack up as many hours of deliberate practice as possible. If you dabble or delay, you’ll never catch up to the people who got a head start. But a closer look at research on the world’s top performers, from professional athletes to Nobel laureates, shows that early specialization is the exception, not the rule.

David Epstein examined the world’s most successful athletes, artists, musicians, inventors, forecasters and scientists. He discovered that in most fields—especially those that are complex and unpredictable—generalists, not specialists, are primed to excel. Generalists often find their path late, and they juggle many interests rather than focusing on one. They’re also more creative, more agile, and able to make connections their more specialized peers can’t see.

Provocative, rigorous, and engrossing, Range makes a compelling case for actively cultivating inefficiency. Failing a test is the best way to learn. Frequent quitters end up with the most fulfilling careers. The most impactful inventors cross domains rather than deepening their knowledge in a single area. As experts silo themselves further while computers master more of the skills once reserved for highly focused humans, people who think broadly and embrace diverse experiences and perspectives will increasingly thrive.

用户评论
"Mental meandering and personal experimentation are sources of power, and head starts are overrated"
2019.11.25 不喜欢读心灵鸡汤/职场/功利性的书。但是这本全不是。当初吸引到我的原因,大概看了一个介绍,说它批判早教,grit,批判固化职业... 读完以后激动不已,到处安利。里面讲的东西我100%认可。只是为什么自己笃定的东西,非要在书上读了才有底气坚持呢? “We learn who we are only by living, and not before.“
“想要相信 或者 我已经相信了” 这样是不对的,这本书大量引用Khaneman,不如直接去读Khaneman,现阶段对我无appeal | 大致略读 文中材料不新(10yr+)例子局限 作者本身是个reportor不是科学家
大概三章就能讲明白的道理,车轱辘话不停地说,反复地说……
读完整本书的收获和读完书名的收获差不多。书的内容基本就是用各种角落里挖出的符合自己论点的真实故事,浇上无限的琐碎细节,生生填满的。
2022.3.3: 失望,读一半弃。本来希望可以看到dot是怎么connect的精彩思路顺带给自己找点信心(一年前现在好像已经不需要了),结果作者车轱辘话反复强调为啥要connect。像读了个巨长的report,松散得是我prof要打回去重写的程度。读读书评就行了。
读了两次总算读完,主题精彩,开始的几章相当引人入胜。不少例证要深究可能并不算科学,但能给读者以有效启示(比如NASA的僵化文化)。但全书的风格其实更像是十几个不同章节的松散结合,从中段开始不少章节缺乏独立性,可能更像一个个被插到书里本属于期刊的长篇。后期章节的案例堆叠感过强很容易有乏味的感觉。简单总结下来其实就是避免陷入过度专业化的牛角尖、个人保持多元化的吸收和好奇心,组织也可以通过多元化来保持活力已避免僵化风险
一万小时理论只适用于kind environment,但是现实中大部分情形都是wicked env,需要广度而不是深度。很多科学和技术上的难题都是应用了跨专业跨学科的知识解决的。过度specialization是很危险的,比如擅长于心脏搭桥的外科医生倾向于用搭桥解决一切问题即使证据表明搭桥在很多情况下并没有帮助,比如NASA盲目相信定量数据而对不可量化的危险信号视而不见导致了挑战者号的悲剧。对我来说最有用的信息:想换工作的人中,换了工作的人会更开心;虽然换工作或专业意味着放弃之前的一些积累,但是这些人反倒会因为涉猎较广而且对自己真正喜欢什么想要追求什么有着更清醒的认识,他们后期发展也会较好;CEO大部分有着多部门多岗位的工作经验
读起来感觉太琐碎了。“Mental meandering and personal experimentation are sources of power, and head starts are overrated. ”
不同的职业需要的技能是不同的,10000小时的规则只适用于有严格规则的职业。在很多很多的普通职业中,见识的广度比深度更为重要。一味地向深度挖掘只会造成自己的眼界狭窄。唯数据论,也会造成组织缺少活力。 对于本书的评价就是太冗长了。看完简直浪费生命。