书籍 The Political Unconscious的封面

The Political Unconscious

Fredric Jameson

出版时间

1982-08-31

ISBN

9780801492228

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

In this ground-breaking and influential study Fredric Jameson explores the complex place and function of literature within culture. At the time Jameson was actually writing the book, in the mid to late seventies, there was a major reaction against deconstruction and poststructuralism. As one of the most significant literary theorists, Jameson found himself in the unenviable position of wanting to defend his intellectual past yet keep an eye on the future. With this book he carried it off beautifully. A landmark publication, The Political Unconscious takes its place as one of the most meaningful works of the twentieth century.

Fredric Jameson is Professor of French at Yale University. He is author of Marxism and Form; The Prison-House of Language; and Fables of Aggression: Wyndham Lewis, the Modernist as Fascist.

目录
1. On Interpretation: Literature as a Socially Symbolic Act
2. Magical Narratives: On the Dialectical Use of Genre Criticism
3. Realism and Desire: Balzac and the Problem of the Subject
4. Authentic Ressentiment: Generic Discontinuities and Ideologemes in the "Experimental" Novels of George Gissing
5. Romance and Reification: Plot Construction and Ideological Closure in Joseph Conrad

显示全部
用户评论
比中译本好读
方法论满分!詹明信在1980年代初就已经把新的历史主义倾向透析干净了。必须保卫马克思和精神分析对于”历史“的认识。待我有空把第一章重译一遍。
can't appreciate it... 其实看晚期资本主义逻辑就觉得这种风格我不是很喜欢。还是需要个orientation吧...
读序言和结论,詹明信提出任何一种统治阶级意识和被统治阶级意识都是互相成镜像的,恰恰在被统治阶级里能找到统治阶级的能指库,进而言之,任何的集团意识都是乌托邦的,因为它必然需要一种对经验可及的集体性的发想,乃至最终对最后设的原始的无阶级和无团体划分的集体的幻觉(这里詹明信回溯到涂尔干的对社会实体的超个体性)。因而,要回避萨林斯对意识形态分析的工具论的指责,马克思主义文化分析必须是既阶级论的,又乌托邦分析的。用后来者的目光,我们或许会说这是症候或者幻象分析的前奏,只不过,詹明信还并未来到大他者并不存在这一点,也就是说,他还没有把一切历史都是非历史(阶级斗争)和主体是结构生产的一个效果这两条路线整合起来,或者说,他还在构思出历史化涂尔干或者普兰查兹化阿尔都塞的起始点…
不是第一次也不是最后一次。第一次中文没法看,英文老长句子要读很久。这次读有了一点理论基础,先读过了几篇用上了这本书的论文,反过来读好一点点。但是还是不是很行,必须要了解卢卡契的整体,阿尔图瑟的多重决定论,巴赫金的狂欢,格雷马斯的语义矩阵,所有元批评的对象,当然还有传统马克思最主要的几个概念,还要19世纪现实主义作品,还有康拉德的吉姆爷/黑水手/诺斯托洛姆。但是出乎意料的喜欢...这种对所有阐释方法的再次阐释,不追求最终答案而是暴露更多的问题的目标,Marxism as the last horizon. 还有可以从骇人的长句里隐约透出的热忱..另:sea as a no-space & as a strategy of containment/ the resulting tension.
(17 July 2022 Strand Book Store NYC) 久仰詹明信大名,读起来未免失望。头尾是精华,对具体作品的分析过于僵化了
也很好,虽然不如十年前写的,但体现出更清晰的方法论自觉,并且为20世纪批评实践提供了一个奠基性和高度生产性的解释模式。开头的工作总结、论三个horizon、论巴尔扎克/康拉德和结尾提出“肯定解释学”,都是不一定sound但相当insightful的段落。模型中关于心理学的预设是一个明显的弱点。
text&context,怎么分析当下文本呢?