书籍 Class Work的封面

Class Work

Terry Woronov

出版时间

2015-11-25

ISBN

9780804795418

评分

★★★★★

标签

教育

书籍介绍

Images of Chinese teens with their heads buried in books for hours on end, preparing for high-stakes exams, dominate understandings of Chinese youth in both China and the West. But what about young people who are not on the path to academic success? What happens to youth who fail the state's high-stakes exams? What many—even in China—don't realize is that up to half of the nation's youth are flunked out of the academic education system after 9th grade.

Class Work explores the consequences for youth who have failed these exams, through an examination of two urban vocational schools in Nanjing, China. Through a close look at the students' backgrounds, experiences, the schools they attend, and their trajectories into the workforce, T.E. Woronov explores the value systems in contemporary China that stigmatize youth in urban vocational schools as "failures," and the political and economic structures that funnel them into working-class futures. She argues that these marginalized students and schools provide a privileged window into the ongoing, complex intersections between the socialist and capitalist modes of production in China today and the rapid transformation of China's cities into post-industrial, service-based economies. This book advances the notion that urban vocational schools are not merely "holding tanks" for academic failures; instead they are incipient sites for the formation of a new working class.

目录
Cover
Copyright
Title Page
Contents
Acknowledgments

显示全部
用户评论
Chinese version of learning to labour
a new working class?
作者谈到职业中学学生有一套自己moral community,感觉有点像是为自己被人诟病的东西找了一个合理化的借口……另外,因为家庭贫困的原因导致他们部门是竟然为了省钱而去读职业中学的有点惊讶;同时作者也谈到了进入职业中学和进入普通高中的比例是被规定好的,所以很大程度上不只是因为学生自己的原因更是因为结构性的原因导致了他们进入职业高中;作者说这是一个新的阶级的产生,但这个阶级因为教育文凭的原因只能水平流动,不能向上流动,教育文凭这个东西…有点感觉把人分成了三六九等了,而重视教育文凭是因为历史原因:教育变成了国家发展的一个手段,于是乎各种大力推崇和宣扬教育的重要性,形成了利用教育去划分阶级的情况。。
告别县中,城镇化中空,进城万岁。市场入局,救火难遂。孔方滚滚,掉入囊中;一地之主,献身考核,政绩锦标,下有对策;教师无辜,日夜劬劳;父母择校,被解“虚荣”,实属武断;特色本土,特别问题,机制难行,个人体尝;来日何期,普通教育、职业教育,济济一堂,分轨相持,持平俱谈,无厌无妨。
结构清晰,也比较易懂,作者在书中找到了很多可以继续深入挖掘的点,比如学生认为自己为了“孝”而选择职专,并不是“坏”学生等等
他者视角对中国职校的观察,感觉好像会停留在国内熟知的表象上进行了一些原因、社会结构与政策的分析,但异质性、旁观介绍异域文化的感觉还是有点强…(也有可能是我看的太粗略)|一个国家的宏观教育政策是控制划分阶级的工具,无论如何包装与宣传
研究并非完美,但开拓了未垦地。
很社會學的討論,不過應該大多都是常識吧? 結論對“運河中學”的兩個學生的描述很有意思,很立體嘛