书籍 The Curse of Bigness的封面

The Curse of Bigness

Tim Wu

出版时间

2018-11-13

ISBN

9780999745465

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

From the man who coined the term "net neutrality," author of The Master Switch and The Attention Merchants, comes a warning about the dangers of excessive corporate and industrial concentration for our economic and political future.

We live in an age of extreme corporate concentration, in which global industries are controlled by just a few giant firms -- big banks, big pharma, and big tech, just to name a few. But concern over what Louis Brandeis called the "curse of bigness" can no longer remain the province of specialist lawyers and economists, for it has spilled over into policy and politics, even threatening democracy itself. History suggests that tolerance of inequality and failing to control excessive corporate power may prompt the rise of populism, nationalism, extremist politicians, and fascist regimes. In short, as Wu warns, we are in grave danger of repeating the signature errors of the twentieth century.

In The Curse of Bigness, Columbia professor Tim Wu tells of how figures like Brandeis and Theodore Roosevelt first confronted the democratic threats posed by the great trusts of the Gilded Age--but the lessons of the Progressive Era were forgotten in the last 40 years. He calls for recovering the lost tenets of the trustbusting age as part of a broader revival of American progressive ideas as we confront the fallout of persistent and extreme economic inequality.

Tim Wu is a policy advocate, a professor at Columbia Law School and a contributing opinion writer for The New York Times. He is best known for coining the phrase "net neutrality." He worked on competition policy in the Obama White House and the Federal Trade Commission, served as senior enforcement counsel at the New York Office of the Attorney General, and worked at the Suprem...

(展开全部)

用户评论
谢谢Tim Wu的input
好长一段时间我都不理解崇尚自由经济的美国为何都在饭托拉低。这本书给了我很好的答案,这是对自由经济的反思,当企业垄断的能力太大,它的权力就超越了商业,而渗透到政治、社会的方方面面,最终会伤害到民主社会。以前的人提倡consumer welfare,但却只是以消费者付出的价格有没增加为垄断是好是坏的唯一标准。作者呼唤的是一种新的评判标准:垄断是不是抑制了竞争,只要抑制了竞争,这种trust都要被anti。话又说回来,这理念很好,但实操起来也很难……怎么去衡量是否抑制竞争呢。
All the more worthy exactly bc it advocates well-supported common sense. 芝加哥学派的痛点在于,深刻真理在我们最需要它的时候经常只以信仰的方式现身,再过几十年才能实证地领悟,who's to enjoy the benefit of the doubt本质是个政治问题,不是经济问题,要看时代的议程。打算就此写一篇文章,题目都想好了,faith-based antitrust law,我能写出来吗拭目以待!吴修铭文笔很好,一点都不油滑,跟他只是学写作也值得
作者真是会写。
好看!
反垄断的角度绝不仅仅只有经济效率。但还有的那部分具体是什么,难以描述。精确的、具有可操作性的理论还是更有吸引力。
篇幅很短,但是观点重复率也太高了,不断复读着自己对于历史的解读和big tech开刀的执念。
一本简明的小册子,记述从1910s到2000s期间美国的反垄断运动历史,并提出改变对美国互联网垄断巨头的垄断现状。值得反思中国的情况。
我们正在重现一个世纪之前,亦即第一个镀金年代的经济与政治,仍然在重蹈更多二十世纪重大错误的巨大危险。那个时代的教训让我们知道,极端的经济集中会导致严重的不平等与物质痛苦,因而助长人们支持民族主义与极端主义的领导政权。我们对上个世纪最大的教训视而不见,并往同样的道路走去。如果说我们从镀金年代学到一件事,那就是:通往法西斯主义与独裁政权的道路上,铺满了未能满足一般大众需求的经济政策。本书的主要目的是了解如何恢复以及更新针对企业巨兽的典型解方——反托拉斯法和其他反垄断法,来迎接我们这个时代的挑战。在将近一个世纪中,反托拉斯法一直是反垄断规范的实践与理论,它试着限制产业过度集中,并且管制垄断的行为。集中的产业有充分的理由投资政治影响力。而且,产业愈集中,需要协调的人就愈少,需要分担的风险也就越少。