书籍 Good Economics for Hard Times的封面

Good Economics for Hard Times

Abhijit V. Banerjee

出版社

PublicAffairs

出版时间

2019-11-12

ISBN

9781610399500

评分

★★★★★

标签

经济

书籍介绍

Two prize-winning economists show how economics, when done right, can help us solve the thorniest social and political problems of our day.

Figuring out how to deal with today's critical economic problems is perhaps the great challenge of our time. Much greater than space travel or perhaps even the next revolutionary medical breakthrough, what is at stake is the whole idea of the good life as we have known it.

Immigration and inequality, globalization and technological disruption, slowing growth and accelerating climate change--these are sources of great anxiety across the world, from New Delhi and Dakar to Paris and Washington, DC. The resources to address these challenges are there--what we lack are ideas that will help us jump the wall of disagreement and distrust that divides us. If we succeed, history will remember our era with gratitude; if we fail, the potential losses are incalculable.

In this revolutionary book, renowned MIT economists Abhijit V. Banerjee and Esther Duflo take on this challenge, building on cutting-edge research in economics explained with lucidity and grace. Original, provocative, and urgent, Good Economics for Hard Times makes a persuasive case for an intelligent interventionism and a society built on compassion and respect. It is an extraordinary achievement, one that shines a light to help us appreciate and understand our precariously balanced world.

用户评论
因为要给本科生开发展经济学的课,选定poor economics做教材后又读了这本新书,觉得比poor economics要好很多,把当下的很多热点问题:移民、国际贸易、AI、种族问题,都用很流畅的文字将各种观点和文献一一道来,有专业度又很容易读。推荐。
blog.jjyao.me/blog/2020/12/20/good-economics-for-hard-times/
Insightful discussions but suggestions appear to be quite disorganized and unclear at times
终于听完了!引用好多文献,感觉作者写论文的时候看完文献做写笔记就写了这本书吼。大部分理论和实证都很新,不过稍微有些凌乱,面面俱到;目前看来就是为新自由主义辩护!;原来hard times指的就是现在!
正是这个时间最该读的书
继上一本《贫穷的本质》后,这对诺奖夫妇重拾老本行,再次通过RCT随机控制实验试图从经济学角度探讨一系列棘手的社会性问题,包括但不限于移民/环境保护/贫富悬殊/社会分裂/贸易等。几乎每次读完社科类的书我都会有种「美国要完蛋了」的感觉,自然这本也不例外。印象比较深的一点是sticky粘性,“好心办坏事”的经济学家往往一厢情愿的相信财富总会平均分配「先富带后富」然而人是非理性的,也不可能依照经济学原理行事,而这也导致了阶级流动性差,财富不均日渐加剧,人人二极管思维。虽然书里也提到经济学本身无法提供万能药,但还是不由得感叹,这么多年过去了,可算有经济学家想起来要「真正」调研关注底层人民了,真是不容易。恐怕对贫困视而不见才是现今社会撕裂的元凶,某些缺德政客也别再甩锅给我们这些移民了才好。
读的原版。经济学生被老师按头读完。 “经济学的重要性不该被经济学家所埋没。”作者是从MIT毕业研究发展和福利系统,走访世界各地致力于脱贫攻坚,三观正又博爱的高级知识分子。听上去很讽刺但是实话,他们是真的想经世济民。 Cash and Care那一章就看得很感慨:贫困的根源是self-enforcing的异化和疏离,应该被转移的不仅仅是资源,是自尊。尊严和自我认同不该只是马斯洛金字塔的最上层建筑,而应该被视为最基本的需求,尤其是在以“高度文明”自诩的某些发达国家。从Trade那一章里看得出西方主流经济学家眼中中国近年来的经济腾飞总体上是正面典型案例,可惜miracle无法被其他国家效仿,制造业链条的完善也不断压缩其他国家劳动力的空间。我没法学的东西当然没什么意义,只好酸一下咯。
Agree with the part that the change is sticky, but put government in the position to save poor people may be not a good idea. The society is a balance, we need poor we need rich and we need both in balance, how? Society progress as technology progress, so does the balance, so act on technology advancement is actually do good of all human being
心不在焉的听完了。。有空应该再看一遍文字版
audiobook 2022/2/10 Just like going through a therapy session whilst listening to this book... Humane approach to public policies +Cash and Care +Dignity - Stereotype can led to self-discriminatory towards the one being stereotyped themself, +Engagement of disadvantaged people,not charity solely. +UBI :Finding a career instead of a job