书籍 The Antinomies Of Realism的封面

The Antinomies Of Realism

Fredric Jameson

出版社

Verso

出版时间

2013-10-08

ISBN

9781781681336

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

"Antinomies of Realism" is Jameson's major study of the nineteenth-century realist novel from a comparative perspective, covering the major literary traditions of Western Europe and the United States. It reviews the most influential theories of artistic and literary realism--and takes an approach based on the social and historical preconditions for its emergence. These combine an attention to the body and its states of feeling as well as to the categories of individualism and temporality (or history). They are studied in a range of major authors, including Zola, Tolstoy, Perez Galdos, and George Eliot.

The very notion of such a synthesis or symbiosis implies the approach of a moment in which its two basic impulses begin again to separate, and this explains the gradual supersession of classical realism in the novel by the various forms of what we call modernism. A coda then explains the survival of "realistic" narratives after the end of classical realism--it is in effect a proposal for the study of popular fiction and mass culture.

Fredric Jameson is Distinguished Professor of Comparative Literature at Duke University. The author of numerous books, he has over the last three decades developed a richly nuanced vision of Western culture’s relation to political economy. He was a recipient of the 2008 Holberg International Memorial Prize. He is the author of many books, including Postmodernism, Or, The Cultur...

(展开全部)

用户评论
艰难读完,大概明白老詹的意思,《寓言与意识形态》在某种意义上解释了这里强调二律背反的用意,但还得补一补他之前的著作......这本书啥时候出中译,私以为对国内的现代文学研究很有价值。
回头要补个书评之类的。。
难读,质量高,需要细细钻研 读后感:论证部分很有意思,最后两章讨论历史小说和科幻小说非常有意思,颠覆了我对科幻小说的认知,很棒!推荐。
写得是还行,但我就想问问,他所提的一系列antinomies究竟和realism有什么联系,换成romanticism不是一样?
老詹的东西一如继往地拗口难懂。照他看来,科幻小说就是未来现实主义的新希望了。
开头结尾的章节都很好,中间论证我觉得有点故意黑话和拉长篇幅。总的感觉是在德勒兹的框架下重新讨论了telling和showing的张力,但是詹明信显然不信德勒兹那一套,他还是个马主义者,心心念念还是那个totality。但是在多大程度上詹明信能够幸免后现代的支离破碎呢?
和詹明信一起结束这一年。。“the most valuable works are those that make their points by way of form rather than content, that relativize their themes and ideas, their ‘meanings,’ to the benefit of formal demonstrations that do not require interpretation to ‘produce’ their problems.” TRUE DAT🤣
《现实主义的二律背反》