书籍 Non-Places的封面

Non-Places

Marc Augé

出版社

Verso

出版时间

1995-05-16

ISBN

9781859840511

评分

★★★★★

标签

建筑

书籍介绍

An ever-increasing proportion of our lives is spent in supermarkets, airports and hotels, on motorways or in front of TVs, computer and cash machines. This invasion of the world by what Marc Auge calls ‘non-space’ results in a profound alteration of awareness: something we perceive, but only in a partial and incoherent manner. Auge uses the concept of ‘supermodernity’ to describe the logic of these late-capitalist phenomena—a logic of excessive information and excessive space. In this fascinating and lucid essay he seeks to establish and intellectual armature for an anthropology of supermodernity. Starting with an attempt to disentangle anthropology from history, Auge goes on to map the distinction between place, encrusted with historical monuments and creative social life, and non-place, to which individuals are connected in a uniform manner and where no organic social life is possible.

Unlike Baudelairean modernity, where old and new are interwoven, supermodernity is self-contained: from the motorway or aircraft, local or exotic particularities are presented two-dimensionally as a sort of theme-park spectacle. Auge does not suggest that supermodernity is all-encompassing: place still exist outside non-place and tend to reconstitute themselves inside it. But he argues powerfully that we are in transit through non-place for more and more of our time, as if between immense parentheses, and concludes that this new form of solitude should become the subject of an anthropology of its own

用户评论
ethnology of solitude
CCHU9035
很社会学,也很人类学,但真正使我感兴趣的是把序言当作小说来写的形式。
像是听了一首后摇,前半理论铺垫所蓄积的力量在第三章对Non-Places的解读中尽数被释放,讨论孤独/non-place中的时间状态/文字对空间的侵略与塑造以及引到的几处贡布雷宇宙观尤为精彩。非常强调supermodernity并非对一切的碎片化,而是一个复杂化的过程。
人类学角度的空间分析
相比于具体的、有意义的人类学地方,非地方源于supermodernity的三种excess(事件,空间,以及个体),只能生产孤独和类似,无法产生意义。主要讨论的非地方包括机场、公路、超市。(但30年后的今天似乎这些地方也产生了自己的意义)
简单讲就是将异域人类学方法倒转研究自身超/后现代性,作者是媒介研究者的话还情有可原,但作为研究非洲的人类学家写出这种东西来实在让人不能接受,当“远方”(第三世界)作为和“此处”(发达世界)相割裂并最终趋向后者的对象时,人类学只能成为满足西方中产异域情趣与哀悼其逝去命运的知识产业。一个全然失去了对全球化的剥削机制与逻辑考量的人类学研究 几乎完全沦为享受全球化红利的小资的自我消遣。所谓的“非场所”无非就是对(单一西方现代性)世界扁平化的想象(这本身是否也陷入了其所批评的整全性诱惑) 而基础设施的风土特性则完全被抹去了,他没法解释机场也是因地而异的。从定义的角度来看 非场所更像是一种由于现代旅行者的跨域技术和不断象征图像化造成的抽象空间 但只对将其看作如此的人才成立。但拿来解释现代旅游的景点蛮到位
竟然一直忘标了...
20世纪法国出了多少惊世骇俗让人目瞪口呆的思想者。相形之下,莫斯列维斯特劳斯杜蒙这些人带出来的人类学,可以说是乏闷了;也没什么出彩的田野。