书籍 Debt的封面

Debt

David Graeber

出版时间

2011-07-11

ISBN

9781933633862

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

Before there was money, there was debt

Every economics textbook says the same thing: Money was invented to replace onerous and complicated barter systems—to relieve ancient people from having to haul their goods to market. The problem with this version of history? There’s not a shred of evidence to support it.

Here anthropologist David Graeber presents a stunning reversal of conventional wisdom. He shows that for more than 5,000 years, since the beginnings of the first agrarian empires, humans have used elaborate credit systems to buy and sell goods—that is, long before the invention of coins or cash. It is in this era, Graeber argues, that we also first encounter a society divided into debtors and creditors.

Graeber shows that arguments about debt and debt forgiveness have been at the center of political debates from Italy to China, as well as sparking innumerable insurrections. He also brilliantly demonstrates that the language of the ancient works of law and religion (words like “guilt,” “sin,” and “redemption”) derive in large part from ancient debates about debt, and shape even our most basic ideas of right and wrong. We are still fighting these battles today without knowing it.

Debt: The First 5,000 Years is a fascinating chronicle of this little known history—as well as how it has defined human history, and what it means for the credit crisis of the present day and the future of our economy.

美国著名人类学家和无政府主义者,伦敦大学戈德史密斯学院高级讲师。他曾为《哈珀斯》、《国家》、Mute杂志、《新左派评论》等国家媒体供稿。大卫•格雷伯是伦敦经济学院2006年度马林诺夫斯基纪念讲座主讲人。该讲座为向重塑研究文化的杰出人类学家致敬而设,每年举办一次。

用户评论
已内化hhh
立场鲜明的无政府主义者,还是很佩服作者的批判能力
大卫·格雷伯在《债:第一个5000年》一书中指出,一些人的收入相对于消费需求或消费意愿存在短期或永久性不足,以高息向他们提供贷款往往是让他们沦为赤贫的罪魁祸首。——《债务和魔鬼》为什么经济学家要一再重复货币起源的错误?因为以物易物的货币起源说是经济学的基石之一,这样才没必要在经济学研究中考虑人的问题,他们不会将人与人之间的爱、恨等复杂的感情关系和社会关系带入到经济学研究中,可事实上这些东西才界定了我们人类的生活。
用这书内容来理解希腊问题,比较刺激。不适合右派阅读,读得下去,也不好作右派了。关于货币的起源,真是颠覆经济学教科书的论述啊。照作者看法,经济学真像是宗教,而非学问了。最后一章前半截,决定中文版的出版。
读大卫格雷伯吐槽是很爽 但如果从金融角度看这本未免也太unorthodox了 比较担忧这样看债市会搞偏
这才是interdisciplinary啊!尽管细节未必精确但是21世纪要想博古通今可是胆子得肥肥的 于是也有推开episteme 边界的力量 学校里的都是什么化工建材interdiscipline🤬🤬🤬
masterpiece,很喜欢作者的观点
知识广博,拓展视野又增加深度。 文笔生花,无法自抑打断阅读大段抄录。 对于债务、金钱、社会等议题提供了相当多有质量的素材与论述。 读起来不轻松,但爱到手不释卷。
so good
这文风真飘。看了后序才知道Graeber的偶像是Mauss,这文风是学到了。